One need merely look at the tweets Gab is making as a company from their own corporate Twitter tag (example) to realize the "free speech" thing is just a cover for their actual agenda.

So just how well do you think Blank Panther would have fared with "immature trolls"

They actually did try to do the same thing to Black Panther that they're trying to do to Captain Marvel now. They just failed.

https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.bleedingcool.com%2F2...

"US paleontologists upset at increase in fossil bed destruction"

Once the fossils have market value other than to palenotologists, non-palentologists will just ignore any that turn up during excavations.

They're not personally being held responsible for the losses and they're not going to lose business to the other phone company for providing crappy service.

No, but I would stop giving them billions of dollars of tax payer money and start regulating them as utilities.

What do you mean, "No"? You just said the same thing I said?

Net neutrality doesn't relate to cable investment.

Agreed. Problem is all the anti-net neutrality people kept saying we had to get rid of it because it stifles investment, and as soon as its gone we'll enter a golden age where everyone has the most super internet access ever.

As with most promises that everything will be fantastic if we just let giant corporations do whatever they like, none of the promised benefits ever appear.

Ironically, the reason the movie moved the ending from Saturn to Jupiter was because they couldn't come up with a suitable visual effect for Saturn's rings.

Because right now, Seattle seems more like an abusive boyfriend stalking his ex and threatening anyone they start dating in hopes they'll have to come crawling back.

Shouldn't they be encouraging New York in hopes of as many Amazon jobs as possible getting transferred there instead of scaring the city off and keeping more of them in Seattle?

That sort of appeal to ignorance (we don't know how X works, therefore any explanation is valid) is the essence of pseudoscience.

You got me. The Russians have been on this account for more than 10 years, slowly building up an excellent karma record, all in pursuit of a fiendish conspiracy that ends with snarking at an Anonymous Coward. ;P

We will replace you. And all your coal rolling desperation does is tell us you know it too.

And believe me, it's sad to see one of our great minds turn into a nut.

I minored in physics at Penn State in the late 90s when he was at the Penn State Institute for Gravitation and the Cosmos at Penn State, so I actually attended some of the original lectures he gave on QM. It was just as nutty back then. He basically dreamed up an entirely new particle that didn't exist in the standard model and which had never been detected and then postulated it interacted with microtubules in some unknown way to cause some unknown effect and *MAGIC* consciousness happens.

Even though it was known at the time that's not what microtubules do and that there's no way a neuron could maintain quantum decoherence long enough for it to have any effect on its synaptic function.

It is and always was a bunch of wishful thinking because Penrose personally couldn't deal with the idea free-will may be an illusion.

Roger Penrose also hasn't published any significant research since the 90s because he turned into a crank and has been spending his time appearing at "conciousness studies" conferences.